This paper reaffirms the author’s thesis (2004) regarding the Navarrese linguistic filiation of the VM with new evidence and precisions. This paper is focused on the contrived and sarcastic objections raised by Frago (2007). Frago maintains his early position (1987), even though he admits that he was not aware of some important data at that time. His presumed refutation falls into contradictions and mistakes. Moreover, this paper exposes the falseness of the assertion he made about his inability to examine, in his initial paper, the facsimile manuscript of the work analysed.